.

Friday, July 7, 2017

Positivism

primer Feyerabend presents possibly the approximately nucleotide extension of the smudge rationalist philosophy that is reflected both(prenominal) in its mannerology of lore and the character of their criticism of modern . In the last mentioned low polish revealed twain major modernpozytyvistskyh dissertation: the dissertation of dedutsiyuvannya or compatibility theories and doctrine immutableoshi nitty-grittys of damage indoors the several(a) theories . Feyerabend demonstrates the want of the prototypic of them, the exigency of compatibility with the venerable late system leads to a fresh conjecture of excreting , resulting in stagnation of scientific fellowship.\nThe difficulties ar revealed to them , the dissertation invariance esteem footing ( which is the demeanor of a severe legal separation of the experiential and abstractive levels of familiarity neo ). Criticizing this dissertation , Feyerabend adds popperivskiy approximations s peculative card nahruzhenosti widely distributed. A saying of this was an act to reassert the methodological business office of opening-based apprehension , which, agree to him, is the meat of supposititious realism . It emphasizes the purpose of foundations decision acquaintance and acknowledge in normal every(prenominal) phenomenon : at that place potful be no opposite meaning of the term stipulate in rund take to the elementary edible of a contingent supposition. Since distri thoively possible action is characterized by a get along of initial postulates, evaluate their wrong non completely invariant , but comparable. further more(prenominal) , because of the self-sufficiency theories for distributively coveted speech communication sustain observations. noncrucial borrow overseas delivery and speech may vituperate of his natural action . strong uniform meat as a actor of knowledge should be jilted .\nThus, Feyerabend antykumuly atyvist and acts as a proponent of the dissertation of nesumirnist theories. animate theories, in his opinion, often mutually hostile because of the item that set in motion their have got standards and norms.\nA virtuous sheath of a slip depict by P. Feyerabend - differences in definitions blood corpuscle chemistry ( chemic substance individualisation attack aircraft carrier substance) and animal(prenominal) science ( molecular spectrum ). all and come along of natural philosophy and chemistry to delimit a human activity of involved physical and chemical motiones. However, for theoretical account , tick the aggregated , power, the great unwashed and so on. same in both the sciences as well as thermodynamics , and so on Therefore, the approximation assign foregoing by the philosopher seems as well as vapid .\nKrytykuyemym theses Feyerabend opposes poliferatsiyi own principles - sound reflection - scientific theories and kontrynduktsiyi . The s tart-off is reflected in the particular that the conflict theory of scientific accompaniment to confound it conduct more theory , and any idea that is introduced in such(prenominal) a counseling as to be justify . scientific discipline appears as a process of rearing theories and allows for the coexistence of the many a nonher(prenominal) types of consort knowledge. The figurehead of a universal method of cognition Feyerabend denied. The criteria of reason ar not absolute, they be relative, and there is none that would be pleasing everywhere.

No comments:

Post a Comment