One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest :: essays research papers fc

QUESTIONWas Forman compelled to change the visor of view in his adaptation of One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest? reactionForman was compelled to change the point of view in adapting the news into a film. thinkA.In the deem psyche Bromdens thoughts go from stark veracity and reasonableness to dreams and visions which would be difficult for an audience to follow.B.The confusion created by the Chiefs switches from reality to fantasy is manageable in literary sort due to the amount of detail and analysis, which idler be put elaborate on paper. However, this is impossible for a director to capture the same understanding and depth in a two-hour film. C.Chief Bromdens thoughts and hallucinations, which are the biography in the book, are erratic and crazy when not compared and elaborated. In a film, it is not always possible to clarify on the type of expand found in the book.D.There is not enough cadence nor is it possible to elucidate into the amount of detail which knowingness K esey goes into in the book. This is due to the accompaniment that Chief Bromden starts out playing deaf and dumb and even when he does begin to talk it is not in great amounts or details. In order to capture the heart of the story a director would pay off to use a broader narration, which a diverse audience could understand.E.A book allows for great amounts of details due to the depth of words and the imagery they can evoke in a readers mind. There is not enough eon in a film for all the detail of a book to come out and explain every single character to an audience, which need to be constantly entertained to keep their focus.CITATIONSThis is an autobiographical reference to how Ken Kesey came to write One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest and the processes, which made it realistic and unreal at the same time.But also at the same time Bromden is an unreliable witness he is also an extremely reliable one. We find oneself he tells us the truth about McMurphy in fact, he tells it with m uch(prenominal) penetration and insight that it has a consistent and coherent shape and inwardness for us. The combination of hallucination and truth in the narration is a renowned stylistic accomplishment. Fact and fantasy alternate, but the reader has no barrier distinguishing one from the other, and thus they successfully complement each other.