Verdict Of The Coroner's Inquest Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Verdict Of The Coroners Inquest - Essay Examplea dependent position. (Matthews, 2010) The law does draw a distinction between neglect and the neglectfulness While essentially accidental, a failure by dealgivers was the actual causative historic periodnt. The medical staff failed in their essential duties towards this patient, but health care was provided although the priggish precautions were not taken to ensure that the prescribed treatment was administered correctly. It is noteworthy that the specialist pharmacist stated that no single person w as completely responsible for the death, in the capacity of sole culprit. ?he system was in place, not wholly effective.There were mistakes made by several objet darties. Yet it is clear that the untrue dosage was clearly an error, per the professional diagnosis by Dr. R, where he described the dispensation of the medication as glaringly wrong, and a huge aberration. Furthermore, investigations of medical findings pertaining to nodula r sclerosing Hodgkins disease will get a line that the intend is not invariably fatal. (van Spronsen et al., 2000) The inevitability of Js death is not to be taken for granted with absolute certainty. While a doctor had predicted the patients present post to most likely result in mortality, the death of this individual was not unavoidable from this condition, nor should the consequences of his demise be viewed as less severe, on account of Js age or health status. Even should the physicians estimate of 27 months induce been accurate, negligence is still apparent, and the patient was not entirely beyond hope. And while the Dr. has noted that Js condition was terminal, with a 27 month probable lifespan based on medical precedent for others suffering from nodular sclerosing Hodgkins disease, the five-year survival rate ranges from 90 to 60%, depending upon... This essay analyzes that there are no apparent incentives that would suggest the error to be the result of deliberate action on the part of the patient, or on the part of the pharmacist. Thus negligence contributed to the accidental death of the patient, J. in the absence of actual malice, or evidence of deliberate denial of care and the narrative finding of fact is warranted in the case of J.This essay analyzes that there are no apparent incentives that would suggest the error to be the result of deliberate action on the part of the patient, or on the part of the pharmacist. Thus negligence contributed to the accidental death of the patient, J. in the absence of actual malice, or evidence of deliberate denial of care and the narrative verdict is warranted in the case of J. The purposes of this inquest require an exhaustive summary of the circumstances surrounding the death of the patient, ways in which that death might have been prevented and contributing factors. This verdict has attempted to give a factual account of the demise of J, in the absence of deliberate, premeditated actions that were intend ed to cause death. This would also C exclude the deliberate withholding of sustenance or treatment. The narrative is an accounting of events and contributing factors, but it is not appropriate in this instance to make a definitive attempt to assign blame in the criminal sense. The pharmacy staff could have double checked their assumptions. The chief pharmacist could have ensured that those at a lower place him operated in accordance with the proper protocols. Nurses at the rest home should have had an opportunity to at least question the dosage, should any of them have been familiar with the pattern dosages of this sort of chemotherapy. The principal pharmacist should in all probability face sanction, but his actions were not deliberate, and an attempt was made to provide care albeit grossly incorrect.